Data Analysis and Decision-making

To ensure faithful implementation, the person responsible for planning and support should regularly check the learner’s progress and observe the work of the person responsible for implementing the intervention. See the section Coaching and Supporting Staff which describes ongoing support in greater detail.
The Tracking Progress and Maintenance Assessment sections below detail how Fynn’s team documented their progress and planned the skills maintenance assessment:
Tracking Progress
Tracking Progress
Date | Frequency of the Targeted Behaviour | Changes Made to the Reinforcement Schedule | Initials and Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Week of February 8 | Make bed: 4 times Wash dishes: - Dry dishes: - Put dishes away: 4 times Vacuum: 1 time |
☐ No ☑︎ Yes: Offer two tokens if Fynn chooses to wash or dry the dishes. |
Fynn always chose to put the dishes away. We are going to try to motivate him to wash or dry the dishes. Mr. and Ms. Faulkner did not offer Fynn a token when he tried to negotiate with them. Well done! DB |
Week of February 22 | Make bed: 4 times Wash dishes: - Dry dishes: 2 times Put dishes away: 3 times Vacuum: 1 time |
☑︎ No ☐ Yes |
The parents said they were pleased with Fynn’s progress. They did not expect him to progress so quickly. DB |
Week of March 11 | Make bed: 5 times Wash dishes: - Dry dishes: 2 times Put dishes away: 2 times Vacuum: 1 time |
☑︎ No ☐ Yes |
DB |
Week of March 25 | Make bed: 5 times Wash dishes: 1 time Dry dishes: 2 times Put dishes away: 2 times Vacuum: 1 time |
☐ No ☑︎ Yes: Transition to the intermittent reinforcement program. |
Goal achieved. Moving on to the intermittent reinforcement program. DB |
Maintenance Assessment
Maintenance Assessment
Date | Person Responsible | Frequency of Behaviour | Initials and Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Week of April 8 | Ms. Badel | ||
Week of April 22 | Ms. Badel | ||
Week of May 6 | Ms. Badel | ||
Week of June 3 | Ms. Badel | ||
Week of June 17 | Ms. Badel | ||
Semaine du 17 juin | Ms. Badel |
Since it is Fynn’s parents who implement the reinforcement program, Ms. Badel will not be able to observe them in action or offer them feedback. However, Ms. Badel and Fynn’s parents decide to do follow-ups every two weeks to review the data and discuss the program. Ms. Badel will then be able to give them advice and offer them support.
Here is a scenario to help you check your understanding of concepts you learned during the session. Carefully observe the information provided and think about the decision you would make in each case.
Isabelle

Here is the Data Collection Sheet for Isabelle’s current level.
Objective
Determine the frequency or total duration of a behaviour from observations of the learner’s current level.
Question
Based on the data for the current level, for how long does Isabelle exhibit the target behaviour during each of the observation periods?
Click here to view a sample answer.
Objective
Analyze the current-level data in order to write a SMART goal.
Question
Based on the same data, how would you complete the Learner's current level and SMART goal sections of the Intervention Planning Tool?
Click here to view a sample response.
Learner’s current level
During the three 5-minute observation sessions, Isabelle managed to demonstrate the targeted skill, on average, for 1 minute and 24 seconds (which is 28% of the time). She moved around during the three observation periods either to change activities or to get equipment.
SMART goal
By March 25, XXXX, Isabelle will be able to perform a known task or activity (i.e. a task or an activity that she can do), without moving to another place, without adult reminders, for a period of five consecutive minutes.
During the three 5-minute observation sessions, Isabelle managed to demonstrate the targeted skill, on average, for 1 minute and 24 seconds (which is 28% of the time). She moved around during the three observation periods either to change activities or to get equipment.
SMART goal
By March 25, XXXX, Isabelle will be able to perform a known task or activity (i.e. a task or an activity that she can do), without moving to another place, without adult reminders, for a period of five consecutive minutes.
Objective
Determine whether a token economy system is appropriate given the context.
Question
Based on the information provided about Isabelle, would a token economy system be appropriate for her?
Click here to view possible responses.
- Isabelle has a fairly short attention span, and it might be difficult for her to tolerate the delay between handing over a token and accessing the reinforcer.
- A token economy system is probably not the best option at the moment. Isabelle will probably need to have access to a strong reinforcer very quickly in order for it to be effective.
Isabelle's team plans to implement a positive reinforcement program to increase the duration of the targeted behaviour. The goal is for Isabelle to be able to complete a task or activity for 5 consecutive minutes. However, based on current-level data, she is able to complete a task or activity for only about 1 min and 24 seconds. The team therefore decides to start with an achievable goal and gradually increase the difficulty level to a duration of 5 minutes. The first reinforcement criterion is set at 1 minute and 15 seconds, to ensure that Isabelle can access the reinforcer often at the start of the procedure. After Isabelle has achieved this goal for 3 consecutive sessions, the goal will be increased by 15 seconds up to a total time of 5 minutes. A visual timer will be placed in Isabelle’s field of vision so she can see how much time she has left before accessing her reinforcer.
Mr. Howard will be responsible for offering the reinforcer to Isabelle for 15-20 seconds and collecting the data. He can also encourage Isabelle by pointing at the timer if she gets up or tries to move. If Isabelle resumes her work in less than 5 seconds, the timer continues. If she moves and an adult needs to encourage her to return to her seat, the adult should reset the timer.
Mr. Howard conducts a preference assessment trial with Isabelle and identifies several potential reinforcers. In order not to interrupt the task or activity too much, the team decides to choose reinforcers that can be offered and removed quickly (e.g., social reinforcement, drawing/colouring materials, stickers, glitter, play dough, and dolls).
Objective
Develop the criteria for a continuous reinforcement program.
Question
Based on the information known about Isabelle, how would you complete the Continuous Reinforcement section of the Intervention Planning Tool?
Click here to view a sample response.
Possible response:
Continuous Reinforcement |
---|
|
|
|
|
Objective
Make decisions based on data.
Question
According to the information provided in Isabelle’s Data Collection Sheet, what decision(s) would you make following the session on December 17?
Click here to view possible responses.
- The first trial was successful (December 16). The second trial was also successful (December 17). Depending on the criterion, if Isabelle resumes the task or activity in less than 5 seconds after being prompted, the timer continues. The third trial was successful (December 17).
- Isabelle applied herself to performing the task for 1 min 15 s for 3 consecutive sessions, so she reached the goal of the first step of the intervention.
- The team can now move on to Step 2, which is to increase the criterion to 1 min 30 s. The intervention appears to be effective, so no further changes are needed to the reinforcement program at this time.
Objective
Use a Data Collection Sheet and the Intervention Planning Tool to make decisions about the next steps in the intervention.
Question
Based on the information on Isabelle’s Data Collection Sheet, how would you complete the Tracking Progress section of the Intervention Planning Tool?
Click here to view a sample response.
Tracking Progress
Date | Frequency/Duration of the Target Behaviour | Changes Made to Reinforcement Schedule | Initials and Comments |
---|---|---|---|
December 16th | 1 min 15 s | ☑︎ No ☐ Yes |
O.H. |
December 17th | 1 min 15 s | ☑︎ No ☐ Yes |
O.H. |
December 17th | 17th 1 min 15 s | ☐ No ☑︎ Yes: Increase criteria to 1 min 30 s |
Isabelle reached her goal of the first step. She succeeded at two unprompted trials and one prompted trial. O.H. |
-
Implementation Next item